| Title |
Validation of a novel Multi-Gas sensor for volcanic HCl alongside H2S and SO2 at Mt. Etna
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Bulletin of Volcanology, April 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00445-017-1114-z |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
T. J. Roberts, T. Lurton, G. Giudice, M. Liuzzo, A. Aiuppa, M. Coltelli, D. Vignelles, G. Salerno, B. Couté, M. Chartier, R. Baron, J. R. Saffell, B. Scaillet |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 38 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 38 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 11 | 29% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 5% |
| Professor | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 4 | 11% |
| Unknown | 13 | 34% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 15 | 39% |
| Engineering | 2 | 5% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 1 | 3% |
| Energy | 1 | 3% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 2 | 5% |
| Unknown | 16 | 42% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 September 2020.
All research outputs
#7,524,541
of 22,963,381 outputs
Outputs from Bulletin of Volcanology
#386
of 1,095 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#119,921
of 310,087 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Bulletin of Volcanology
#10
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,963,381 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,095 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 310,087 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.