↓ Skip to main content

Spatial disparity in the distribution of superfund sites in South Carolina: an ecological study

Overview of attention for article published in Environmental Health, November 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
26 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
51 Mendeley
Title
Spatial disparity in the distribution of superfund sites in South Carolina: an ecological study
Published in
Environmental Health, November 2013
DOI 10.1186/1476-069x-12-96
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kristen Burwell-Naney, Hongmei Zhang, Ashok Samantapudi, Chengsheng Jiang, Laura Dalemarre, LaShanta Rice, Edith Williams, Sacoby Wilson

Abstract

According to the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Superfund is a federal government program implemented to clean up uncontrolled hazardous waste sites. Twenty-six sites in South Carolina (SC) have been included on the National Priorities List (NPL), which has serious human health and environmental implications. The purpose of this study was to assess spatial disparities in the distribution of Superfund sites in SC.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 51 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
India 1 2%
Unknown 50 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 10 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 16%
Student > Bachelor 7 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 10%
Researcher 5 10%
Other 9 18%
Unknown 7 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 12 24%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 12%
Social Sciences 5 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 8%
Other 11 22%
Unknown 9 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 March 2020.
All research outputs
#2,549,593
of 22,729,647 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Health
#454
of 1,484 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,065
of 215,641 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Health
#8
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,729,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,484 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 31.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 215,641 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.