↓ Skip to main content

An analysis of the contribution rules of Japanese academic journals in the field of humanities and social science (II)

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Information Processing & Management / Joho Kanri, January 2007
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
89 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
An analysis of the contribution rules of Japanese academic journals in the field of humanities and social science (II)
Published in
Journal of Information Processing & Management / Joho Kanri, January 2007
DOI 10.1241/johokanri.49.622
Authors

Setsuko FUJITA

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 89 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 89 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 1%
Unknown 88 99%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 1 1%
Unknown 88 99%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 April 2017.
All research outputs
#14,599,159
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Information Processing & Management / Joho Kanri
#475
of 953 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#141,161
of 168,339 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Information Processing & Management / Joho Kanri
#10
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 953 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 168,339 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.