↓ Skip to main content

CFTR-dependent defect in alternatively-activated macrophages in cystic fibrosis

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Cystic Fibrosis, April 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (52nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (74th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
56 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
69 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
CFTR-dependent defect in alternatively-activated macrophages in cystic fibrosis
Published in
Journal of Cystic Fibrosis, April 2017
DOI 10.1016/j.jcf.2017.03.011
Pubmed ID
Authors

Abdullah A. Tarique, Peter D. Sly, Patrick G. Holt, Anthony Bosco, Robert S. Ware, Jayden Logan, Scott C. Bell, Claire E. Wainwright, Emmanuelle Fantino

Abstract

The role of the macrophages in cystic fibrosis (CF) lung disease has been poorly studied. We hypothesized that alternatively activated M2 macrophages are abnormal in CF lung disease. Blood samples were collected from adults (n=13) children (n=27) with CF on admission for acute pulmonary exacerbation and when clinically stable. Monocytes were differentiated into macrophages and polarized into classical (M1) and alternatively-activated (M2) phenotypes, function determined ex-vivo and compared with healthy controls. In the absence of functional cystic fibrosis trans-membrane conductance regulator (CFTR), either naturally in patients with CF or induced with CFTR inhibitors, monocyte-derived macrophages do not respond to IL-13/IL-4, fail to polarize into M2s associated with a post-transcriptional failure to produce and express IL-13Rα1 on the macrophage surface Polarization to the M1 phenotype was unaffected. CFTR-dependent imbalance of macrophage phenotypes and functions could contribute to the exaggerated inflammatory response seen in CF lung disease.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 69 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 69 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 11 16%
Researcher 9 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 12%
Student > Master 7 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 7%
Other 14 20%
Unknown 15 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 14 20%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 14 20%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 10%
Immunology and Microbiology 7 10%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 4%
Other 4 6%
Unknown 20 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 September 2017.
All research outputs
#8,537,346
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Cystic Fibrosis
#630
of 2,111 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#126,752
of 323,974 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Cystic Fibrosis
#20
of 85 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,111 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 323,974 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 85 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.