↓ Skip to main content

Tight performance bounds in the worst-case analysis of feed-forward networks

Overview of attention for article published in Discrete Event Dynamic Systems, June 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (57th percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
20 Mendeley
Title
Tight performance bounds in the worst-case analysis of feed-forward networks
Published in
Discrete Event Dynamic Systems, June 2015
DOI 10.1007/s10626-015-0213-2
Authors

Anne Bouillard, Éric Thierry

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 2 10%
United States 1 5%
Unknown 17 85%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 15%
Student > Master 2 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 10%
Researcher 2 10%
Lecturer 1 5%
Other 4 20%
Unknown 6 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 8 40%
Engineering 4 20%
Decision Sciences 1 5%
Unknown 7 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 April 2017.
All research outputs
#7,524,541
of 22,963,381 outputs
Outputs from Discrete Event Dynamic Systems
#1
of 29 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#81,693
of 240,208 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Discrete Event Dynamic Systems
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,963,381 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 29 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.4. This one scored the same or higher as 28 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 240,208 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them