Title |
Lysyl oxidase drives tumour progression by trapping EGF receptors at the cell surface
|
---|---|
Published in |
Nature Communications, April 2017
|
DOI | 10.1038/ncomms14909 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
HaoRan Tang, Leo Leung, Grazia Saturno, Amaya Viros, Duncan Smith, Gianpiero Di Leva, Eamonn Morrison, Dan Niculescu-Duvaz, Filipa Lopes, Louise Johnson, Nathalie Dhomen, Caroline Springer, Richard Marais |
Abstract |
Lysyl oxidase (LOX) remodels the tumour microenvironment by cross-linking the extracellular matrix. LOX overexpression is associated with poor cancer outcomes. Here, we find that LOX regulates the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) to drive tumour progression. We show that LOX regulates EGFR by suppressing TGFβ1 signalling through the secreted protease HTRA1. This increases the expression of Matrilin2 (MATN2), an EGF-like domain-containing protein that traps EGFR at the cell surface to facilitate its activation by EGF. We describe a pharmacological inhibitor of LOX, CCT365623, which disrupts EGFR cell surface retention and delays the growth of primary and metastatic tumour cells in vivo. Thus, we show that LOX regulates EGFR cell surface retention to drive tumour progression, and we validate the therapeutic potential of inhibiting this pathway with the small molecule inhibitor CCT365623. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 14 | 36% |
Australia | 3 | 8% |
Ireland | 2 | 5% |
United States | 2 | 5% |
Spain | 1 | 3% |
Qatar | 1 | 3% |
Switzerland | 1 | 3% |
Finland | 1 | 3% |
Chile | 1 | 3% |
Other | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 12 | 31% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 18 | 46% |
Scientists | 14 | 36% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 5 | 13% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Finland | 1 | 1% |
Australia | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 93 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 17% |
Researcher | 14 | 15% |
Student > Master | 12 | 13% |
Student > Bachelor | 9 | 9% |
Other | 8 | 8% |
Other | 13 | 14% |
Unknown | 23 | 24% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 25 | 26% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 12 | 13% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 11 | 12% |
Chemistry | 5 | 5% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 3 | 3% |
Other | 10 | 11% |
Unknown | 29 | 31% |