Title |
Technology affordances for intersubjective meaning making: A research agenda for CSCL
|
---|---|
Published in |
International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, August 2006
|
DOI | 10.1007/s11412-006-9660-y |
Authors |
Daniel D. Suthers |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 374 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 20 | 5% |
Australia | 5 | 1% |
Spain | 4 | 1% |
Canada | 4 | 1% |
United Kingdom | 3 | <1% |
Austria | 2 | <1% |
Germany | 2 | <1% |
Greece | 2 | <1% |
Brazil | 1 | <1% |
Other | 13 | 3% |
Unknown | 318 | 85% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 112 | 30% |
Student > Master | 52 | 14% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 43 | 11% |
Researcher | 34 | 9% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 27 | 7% |
Other | 67 | 18% |
Unknown | 39 | 10% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Social Sciences | 153 | 41% |
Computer Science | 78 | 21% |
Psychology | 29 | 8% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 11 | 3% |
Arts and Humanities | 11 | 3% |
Other | 31 | 8% |
Unknown | 61 | 16% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 November 2021.
All research outputs
#5,611,796
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning
#45
of 278 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,767
of 94,369 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 278 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 94,369 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them