You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Bovine aortic arch variant in humans: clarification of a common misnomer.
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
American Journal of Neuroradiology, August 2006
|
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
K F Layton, D F Kallmes, H J Cloft, E P Lindell, V S Cox |
| Abstract |
The term "bovine arch" is widely used to describe a common anatomic variant of the human aortic arch branching. This so-called bovine aortic arch has no resemblance to the bovine aortic arch. We describe the most common human aortic arch branching patterns and compare these with the bovine aortic arch. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 43 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 12 | 28% |
| Spain | 5 | 12% |
| Colombia | 2 | 5% |
| India | 2 | 5% |
| Italy | 1 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
| Mexico | 1 | 2% |
| Saudi Arabia | 1 | 2% |
| Costa Rica | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 16 | 37% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 18 | 42% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 15 | 35% |
| Scientists | 8 | 19% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 185 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 3% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 177 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 38 | 21% |
| Researcher | 25 | 14% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 17 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 17 | 9% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 10 | 5% |
| Other | 43 | 23% |
| Unknown | 35 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 111 | 60% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 4% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 2% |
| Neuroscience | 3 | 2% |
| Engineering | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 14 | 8% |
| Unknown | 43 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 27. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 August 2023.
All research outputs
#1,430,464
of 25,494,370 outputs
Outputs from American Journal of Neuroradiology
#153
of 5,277 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,494
of 90,345 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Journal of Neuroradiology
#1
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,494,370 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,277 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 90,345 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.