↓ Skip to main content

The Interplay Between Anxiety and Social Functioning in Williams Syndrome

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, November 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
55 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
132 Mendeley
Title
The Interplay Between Anxiety and Social Functioning in Williams Syndrome
Published in
Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, November 2013
DOI 10.1007/s10803-013-1984-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Deborah M. Riby, Mary Hanley, Hannah Kirk, Fiona Clark, Katie Little, Ruth Fleck, Emily Janes, Linzi Kelso, Fionnuala O’Kane, Rachel Cole-Fletcher, Marianne Hvistendahl Allday, Darren Hocking, Kim Cornish, Jacqui Rodgers

Abstract

The developmental disorder Williams syndrome (WS) has been associated with an atypical social profile of hyper-sociability and heightened social sensitivity across the developmental spectrum. In addition, previous research suggests that both children and adults with WS have a predisposition towards anxiety. The current research aimed to explore the profiles of social behaviour and anxiety across a broad age range of individuals with the disorder (n = 59, ages 6-36 years). We used insights from parental reports on two frequently used measures, the Spence Children's Anxiety Scale (SCAS-P) and the Social Responsiveness Scale (SRS). Severity of anxiety was correlated with a greater degree of social dysfunction as measured by the SRS in this group. We split the group according to high or low anxiety as measured by the SCAS-P and explored the profile of social skills for the two groups. Individuals high and low in anxiety differed in their social abilities. The results emphasise the need to address anxiety issues in this disorder and to consider how components of anxiety might relate to other features of the disorder.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 132 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 2%
Brazil 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 126 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 25 19%
Student > Bachelor 22 17%
Researcher 14 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 9%
Other 17 13%
Unknown 28 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 65 49%
Social Sciences 8 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 6%
Neuroscience 5 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 4%
Other 4 3%
Unknown 37 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 May 2014.
All research outputs
#2,772,941
of 25,654,806 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
#1,203
of 5,484 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,282
of 229,482 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
#11
of 62 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,654,806 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,484 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 229,482 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 62 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.