Title |
Injury Patterns from Major Urban Terrorist Bombings in Trains: The Madrid Experience
|
---|---|
Published in |
World Journal of Surgery, March 2008
|
DOI | 10.1007/s00268-008-9557-1 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Fernando Turégano‐Fuentes, P. Caba‐Doussoux, J. M. Jover‐Navalón, E. Martín‐Pérez, D. Fernández‐Luengas, L. Díez‐Valladares, D. Pérez‐Díaz, P. Yuste‐García, H. Guadalajara Labajo, R. Ríos‐Blanco, F. Hernando‐Trancho, F. García‐Moreno Nisa, M. Sanz‐Sánchez, C. García‐Fuentes, A. Martínez‐Virto, J. L. León‐Baltasar, J. Vazquez‐Estévez |
Abstract |
Terrorist urban mass casualty incidents (MCI) in the last 3 years have targeted commuter trains at rush hour, producing large numbers of casualties. Civilian care providers are usually not familiar with the types of blast injuries sustained by victims of these MCI. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 86 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 2 | 2% |
Spain | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 83 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 17% |
Researcher | 12 | 14% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 12 | 14% |
Student > Master | 8 | 9% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 7 | 8% |
Other | 16 | 19% |
Unknown | 16 | 19% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 33 | 38% |
Engineering | 7 | 8% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 7% |
Psychology | 5 | 6% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 6% |
Other | 9 | 10% |
Unknown | 21 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 April 2021.
All research outputs
#4,500,100
of 22,729,647 outputs
Outputs from World Journal of Surgery
#752
of 4,219 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,186
of 81,209 outputs
Outputs of similar age from World Journal of Surgery
#5
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,729,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,219 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 81,209 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.