Title |
Primary Care Clinicians Treat Patients with Medically Unexplained Symptoms: A Randomized Controlled Trial
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of General Internal Medicine, May 2006
|
DOI | 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2006.00460.x |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Robert C. Smith, Judith S. Lyles, Joseph C. Gardiner, Corina Sirbu, Annemarie Hodges, Clare Collins, Francesca C. Dwamena, Catherine Lein, C. William Given, Barbara Given, John Goddeeris |
Abstract |
There is no proven primary care treatment for patients with medically unexplained symptoms (MUS). We hypothesized that a long-term, multidimensional intervention by primary care providers would improve MUS patients' mental health. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 33% |
Japan | 1 | 33% |
Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Scientists | 1 | 33% |
Members of the public | 1 | 33% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 128 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 2 | 2% |
United Kingdom | 2 | 2% |
Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
Portugal | 1 | <1% |
Germany | 1 | <1% |
Australia | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 120 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 26 | 20% |
Researcher | 18 | 14% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 13% |
Student > Bachelor | 12 | 9% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 10 | 8% |
Other | 29 | 23% |
Unknown | 16 | 13% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 46 | 36% |
Psychology | 28 | 22% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 11 | 9% |
Social Sciences | 5 | 4% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 3% |
Other | 10 | 8% |
Unknown | 24 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 November 2022.
All research outputs
#6,754,036
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#3,638
of 8,173 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,413
of 81,617 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#33
of 71 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,173 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 81,617 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 71 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.