↓ Skip to main content

A Benchmark Study on Error Assessment and Quality Control of CCS Reads Derived from the PacBio RS

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of data mining in genomics proteomics, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
65 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
108 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A Benchmark Study on Error Assessment and Quality Control of CCS Reads Derived from the PacBio RS
Published in
Journal of data mining in genomics proteomics, January 2013
DOI 10.4172/2153-0602.1000136
Pubmed ID
Authors

Xiaoli Jiao, Xin Zheng, Liang Ma, Geetha Kutty, Emile Gogineni, Qiang Sun, Brad T Sherman, Xiaojun Hu, Kristine Jones, Castle Raley, Bao Tran, David J Munroe, Robert Stephens, Dun Liang, Tomozumi Imamichi, Joseph A Kovacs, Richard A Lempicki, Da Wei Huang

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 108 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Norway 2 2%
United Kingdom 2 2%
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 100 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 19%
Researcher 20 19%
Student > Master 13 12%
Student > Bachelor 8 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 6%
Other 20 19%
Unknown 21 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 44 41%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 25 23%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 8%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 2%
Mathematics 1 <1%
Other 6 6%
Unknown 21 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 November 2013.
All research outputs
#17,700,438
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Journal of data mining in genomics proteomics
#28
of 83 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#197,312
of 292,453 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of data mining in genomics proteomics
#3
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 83 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.6. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 292,453 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 7 of them.