↓ Skip to main content

Nanobubbles Do Not Sit Alone at the Solid–Liquid Interface

Overview of attention for article published in Langmuir, May 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
85 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
82 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Nanobubbles Do Not Sit Alone at the Solid–Liquid Interface
Published in
Langmuir, May 2013
DOI 10.1021/la305138v
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hong Peng, Marc A. Hampton, Anh V. Nguyen

Abstract

The unexpected stability and anomalous contact angle of gaseous nanobubbles at the hydrophobic solid-liquid interface has been an issue of debate for almost two decades. In this work silicon-nitride tipped AFM cantilevers are used to probe the highly ordered pyrolytic graphite (HOPG)-water interface with and without solvent-exchange (a common nanobubble production method). Without solvent-exchange the force obtained by the single force and force mapping techniques is consistent over the HOPG atomic layers and described by DLVO theory (strong EDL repulsion). With solvent-exchange the force is non-DLVO (no EDL repulsion) and the range of the attractive jump-in (>10 nm) over the surface is grouped into circular areas of longer range, consistent with nanobubbles, and the area of shorter range. The non-DLVO nature of the area between nanobubbles suggests that the interaction is no longer between a silicon-nitride tip and HOPG. Interfacial gas enrichment (IGE) covering the entire area between nanobubbles is suggested to be responsible for the non-DLVO forces. The absence of EDL repulsion suggests that both IGE and nanobubbles are not charged. The coexistence of nanobubbles and IGE provides further evidence of nanobubble stability by dynamic equilibrium. The IGE cannot be removed by contact mode scanning of a cantilever tip in pure water, but in a surfactant (SDS) solution the mechanical action of the tip and the chemical action of the surfactant molecules can successfully remove the enrichment. Strong EDL repulsion between the tip and nanobubbles/IGE in surfactant solutions is due to the polar heads of the adsorbed surfactant molecules.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 82 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Israel 1 1%
Unknown 81 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 23 28%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 20%
Student > Master 9 11%
Student > Bachelor 5 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 5%
Other 9 11%
Unknown 16 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 18 22%
Chemistry 13 16%
Physics and Astronomy 8 10%
Materials Science 7 9%
Chemical Engineering 6 7%
Other 12 15%
Unknown 18 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 November 2013.
All research outputs
#15,284,663
of 22,729,647 outputs
Outputs from Langmuir
#10,544
of 13,922 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#119,730
of 193,568 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Langmuir
#76
of 113 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,729,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,922 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 193,568 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 113 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.