↓ Skip to main content

Assembly information services in the European Nucleotide Archive

Overview of attention for article published in Nucleic Acids Research, November 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (51st percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
32 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
42 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Assembly information services in the European Nucleotide Archive
Published in
Nucleic Acids Research, November 2013
DOI 10.1093/nar/gkt1082
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nima Pakseresht, Blaise Alako, Clara Amid, Ana Cerdeño-Tárraga, Iain Cleland, Richard Gibson, Neil Goodgame, Tamer Gur, Mikyung Jang, Simon Kay, Rasko Leinonen, Weizhong Li, Xin Liu, Rodrigo Lopez, Hamish McWilliam, Arnaud Oisel, Swapna Pallreddy, Sheila Plaister, Rajesh Radhakrishnan, Stephane Rivière, Marc Rossello, Alexander Senf, Nicole Silvester, Dmitriy Smirnov, Silvano Squizzato, Petra ten Hoopen, Ana Luisa Toribio, Daniel Vaughan, Vadim Zalunin, Guy Cochrane

Abstract

The European Nucleotide Archive (ENA; http://www.ebi.ac.uk/ena) is a repository for the world public domain nucleotide sequence data output. ENA content covers a spectrum of data types including raw reads, assembly data and functional annotation. ENA has faced a dramatic growth in genome assembly submission rates, data volumes and complexity of datasets. This has prompted a broad reworking of assembly submission services, for which we now reach the end of a major programme of work and many enhancements have already been made available over the year to components of the submission service. In this article, we briefly review ENA content and growth over 2013, describe our rapidly developing services for genome assembly information and outline further major developments over the last year.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 2%
Italy 1 2%
Sweden 1 2%
Finland 1 2%
United States 1 2%
Unknown 37 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 17 40%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 14%
Student > Master 4 10%
Other 3 7%
Student > Postgraduate 2 5%
Other 4 10%
Unknown 6 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 18 43%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 11 26%
Social Sciences 2 5%
Computer Science 2 5%
Unspecified 1 2%
Other 2 5%
Unknown 6 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 January 2014.
All research outputs
#7,435,148
of 22,729,647 outputs
Outputs from Nucleic Acids Research
#12,398
of 26,313 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#71,684
of 215,945 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nucleic Acids Research
#200
of 393 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,729,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 26,313 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 215,945 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 393 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.