↓ Skip to main content

DBT in BPD

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Psychiatric & Mental Health Nursing, November 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
40 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
403 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
DBT in BPD
Published in
Journal of Psychiatric & Mental Health Nursing, November 2013
DOI 10.1111/jpm.12116
Pubmed ID
Authors

B. O'Connell, M. Dowling

Abstract

Borderline Personality Disorder (BPD) is a complex disorder that is difficult to treat. Five psychotherapeutic approaches are used in the management of BPD. These include cognitive behavioural therapy, mentalization-based therapy, schema-focused therapy, transference-focused therapy and dialectical behaviour therapy (DBT). Of the five approaches used to manage BPD, DBT has been studied the most extensively. Dialectical behaviour therapy (DBT) is a multi-pronged approach comprising of skills-based training, individual psychotherapy, telephone calls and consultation team meetings. DBT can have a positive effect on therapists, shifting therapeutic pessimism towards one of optimism with DBT therapists also describing personal changes resulting from their work with clients. A considerable number of trials have been conducted as DBT was developed in the early 1990s, and most support the usefulness of BPD in the treatment of BPD. However, two Cochrane reviews conclude that more research is needed to provide stronger evidence in support of DBT for the management of BPD.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 403 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Thailand 1 <1%
Unknown 398 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 100 25%
Student > Master 74 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 27 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 26 6%
Student > Postgraduate 18 4%
Other 50 12%
Unknown 108 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 171 42%
Nursing and Health Professions 30 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 27 7%
Social Sciences 23 6%
Neuroscience 8 2%
Other 29 7%
Unknown 115 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 January 2019.
All research outputs
#6,529,257
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Psychiatric & Mental Health Nursing
#457
of 1,260 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#55,949
of 228,604 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Psychiatric & Mental Health Nursing
#1
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,260 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 228,604 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them