↓ Skip to main content

Mycobacterium Tuberculosis, Autoimmunity, and Vitamin D

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Reviews in Allergy & Immunology, June 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
patent
1 patent
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
66 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
83 Mendeley
Title
Mycobacterium Tuberculosis, Autoimmunity, and Vitamin D
Published in
Clinical Reviews in Allergy & Immunology, June 2009
DOI 10.1007/s12016-009-8150-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yinon Shapira, Nancy Agmon-Levin, Yehuda Shoenfeld

Abstract

Mycobacterium tuberculosis (TB) is a major cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Current anti-TB chemotherapies, although effective, are associated with side effects and are limited in treating drug-resistant strands. Autoimmune diseases are a leading cause of morbidity and mortality, with a growing mass of evidence implicating infections (e.g., TB) as their triggers. The burden of TB might further increase by reactivation threats hovering over millions harboring latent infection, thus, calling for novel approaches for this dire ailment. In recent years, the non-calcemic physiological actions of vitamin D have drawn a great deal of attention. In this review, we will focus on the role of vitamin D in the innate immune defense against TB on the one hand and conversely on the immunomodulatory effects of vitamin D on autoimmunity. Taken together, the suggested dual role of vitamin D in treating TB infection and possibly preventing associated autoimmunity will constitute the basis of the current review.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 83 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
Unknown 80 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 14 17%
Student > Bachelor 14 17%
Researcher 9 11%
Other 6 7%
Student > Postgraduate 6 7%
Other 20 24%
Unknown 14 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 36 43%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 12%
Immunology and Microbiology 9 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 5%
Other 6 7%
Unknown 14 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 April 2020.
All research outputs
#4,485,112
of 23,975,976 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Reviews in Allergy & Immunology
#174
of 690 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,796
of 114,351 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Reviews in Allergy & Immunology
#4
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,975,976 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 690 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 114,351 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.