↓ Skip to main content

Three CAPD cases who maintained increased ultrafiltration volume by long-term and intermittent oral administration of low dose of tranexamic acid

Overview of attention for article published in Nihon Toseki Igakkai Zasshi, January 2001
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Three CAPD cases who maintained increased ultrafiltration volume by long-term and intermittent oral administration of low dose of tranexamic acid
Published in
Nihon Toseki Igakkai Zasshi, January 2001
DOI 10.4009/jsdt.34.1333
Authors

Masaaki Nakayama, Satoru Kuriyama, Naohiko Kato, Hiroshi Hayakawa, Masato Ikeda, Hiroyuki Terawaki, Hiroyasu Yamamoto, Keitarou Yokoyama, Tatsuo Hosoya

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 August 2020.
All research outputs
#15,169,543
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Nihon Toseki Igakkai Zasshi
#65
of 177 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#96,358
of 114,352 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nihon Toseki Igakkai Zasshi
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 177 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 114,352 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them