You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Life‐time prevalence and psychosocial correlates of adolescent direct self‐injurious behavior: A comparative study of findings in 11 European countries
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Child Psychology & Psychiatry, November 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1111/jcpp.12166 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Romuald Brunner, Michael Kaess, Peter Parzer, Gloria Fischer, Vladimir Carli, Christina W. Hoven, Camilla Wasserman, Marco Sarchiapone, Franz Resch, Alan Apter, Judith Balazs, Shira Barzilay, Julio Bobes, Paul Corcoran, Doina Cosmanm, Christian Haring, Miriam Iosuec, Jean‐Pierre Kahn, Helen Keeley, Gergely Meszaros, Bogdan Nemes, Tina Podlogar, Vita Postuvan, Pilar A. Saiz, Merike Sisask, Alexandra Tubiana, Airi Varnik, Danuta Wasserman |
| Abstract |
To investigate the prevalence and associated psychosocial factors of occasional and repetitive direct self-injurious behavior (D-SIB), such as self-cutting, -burning, -biting, -hitting, and skin damage by other methods, in representative adolescent samples from 11 European countries. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 1 | 20% |
| Brazil | 1 | 20% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 2 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 60% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 20% |
| Scientists | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 417 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 2 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 412 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 58 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 58 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 52 | 12% |
| Researcher | 41 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 28 | 7% |
| Other | 67 | 16% |
| Unknown | 113 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 147 | 35% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 56 | 13% |
| Social Sciences | 32 | 8% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 17 | 4% |
| Neuroscience | 8 | 2% |
| Other | 30 | 7% |
| Unknown | 127 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 June 2021.
All research outputs
#1,691,606
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Child Psychology & Psychiatry
#664
of 3,279 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,300
of 224,740 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Child Psychology & Psychiatry
#11
of 48 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,279 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 224,740 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 48 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.