↓ Skip to main content

Online decoding of object‐based attention using real‐time fMRI

Overview of attention for article published in European Journal of Neuroscience, November 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
14 X users
googleplus
2 Google+ users

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
93 Mendeley
citeulike
4 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Online decoding of object‐based attention using real‐time fMRI
Published in
European Journal of Neuroscience, November 2013
DOI 10.1111/ejn.12405
Pubmed ID
Authors

Adnan M. Niazi, Philip L. C. van den Broek, Stefan Klanke, Markus Barth, Mannes Poel, Peter Desain, Marcel A. J. van Gerven

Abstract

Visual attention is used to selectively filter relevant information depending on current task demands and goals. Visual attention is called object-based attention when it is directed to coherent forms or objects in the visual field. This study used real-time functional magnetic resonance imaging for moment-to-moment decoding of attention to spatially overlapped objects belonging to two different object categories. First, a whole-brain classifier was trained on pictures of faces and places. Subjects then saw transparently overlapped pictures of a face and a place, and attended to only one of them while ignoring the other. The category of the attended object, face or place, was decoded on a scan-by-scan basis using the previously trained decoder. The decoder performed at 77.6% accuracy indicating that despite competing bottom-up sensory input, object-based visual attention biased neural patterns towards that of the attended object. Furthermore, a comparison between different classification approaches indicated that the representation of faces and places is distributed rather than focal. This implies that real-time decoding of object-based attention requires a multivariate decoding approach that can detect these distributed patterns of cortical activity.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 93 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 3%
Netherlands 3 3%
Germany 1 1%
Switzerland 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Unknown 83 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 28 30%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 18%
Student > Master 13 14%
Professor 9 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 7 8%
Other 12 13%
Unknown 7 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 28 30%
Psychology 20 22%
Computer Science 13 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 6%
Other 8 9%
Unknown 12 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 January 2014.
All research outputs
#2,085,714
of 25,182,110 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Neuroscience
#436
of 6,157 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,739
of 220,360 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Neuroscience
#3
of 72 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,182,110 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,157 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 220,360 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 72 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.