You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Comparison of mRNA Splicing Assay Protocols across Multiple Laboratories: Recommendations for Best Practice in Standardized Clinical Testing
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Clinical Chemistry, February 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1373/clinchem.2013.210658 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Phillip J. Whiley, Miguel de la Hoya, Mads Thomassen, Alexandra Becker, Rita Brandão, Inge Sokilde Pedersen, Marco Montagna, Mireia Menéndez, Francisco Quiles, Sara Gutiérrez-Enríquez, Kim De Leeneer, Anna Tenés, Gemma Montalban, Demis Tserpelis, Toshio Yoshimatsu, Carole Tirapo, Michela Raponi, Trinidad Caldes, Ana Blanco, Marta Santamariña, Lucia Guidugli, Gorka Ruiz de Garibay, Ming Wong, Mariella Tancredi, Laura Fachal, Yuan Chun Ding, Torben Kruse, Vanessa Lattimore, Ava Kwong, Tsun Leung Chan, Mara Colombo, Giovanni De Vecchi, Maria Caligo, Diana Baralle, Conxi Lázaro, Fergus Couch, Paolo Radice, Melissa C. Southey, Susan Neuhausen, Claude Houdayer, Jim Fackenthal, Thomas Van Overeem Hansen, Ana Vega, Orland Diez, Rien Blok, Kathleen Claes, Barbara Wappenschmidt, Logan Walker, Amanda B. Spurdle, Melissa A. Brown |
| Abstract |
Accurate evaluation of unclassified sequence variants in cancer predisposition genes is essential for clinical management and depends on a multifactorial analysis of clinical, genetic, pathologic, and bioinformatic variables and assays of transcript length and abundance. The integrity of assay data in turn relies on appropriate assay design, interpretation, and reporting. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 98 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 98 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 19 | 19% |
| Researcher | 19 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 15 | 15% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 10 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 8% |
| Other | 12 | 12% |
| Unknown | 15 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 33 | 34% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 19 | 19% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 17 | 17% |
| Chemistry | 4 | 4% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 8 | 8% |
| Unknown | 15 | 15% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 November 2013.
All research outputs
#18,353,475
of 22,729,647 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Chemistry
#6,752
of 7,368 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#229,642
of 307,210 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Chemistry
#43
of 55 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,729,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,368 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 307,210 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 55 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.