You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Spinal manipulative therapy and exercise for seniors with chronic neck pain
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Spine Journal, November 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.spinee.2013.10.035 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Michele Maiers, Gert Bronfort, Roni Evans, Jan Hartvigsen, Kenneth Svendsen, Yiscah Bracha, Craig Schulz, Karen Schulz, Richard Grimm |
| Abstract |
Neck pain, common among the elderly population, has considerable implications on health and quality of life. Evidence supports the use of spinal manipulative therapy (SMT) and exercise to treat neck pain; however, no studies to date have evaluated the effectiveness of these therapies specifically in seniors. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 26 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 9 | 35% |
| United Kingdom | 6 | 23% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 1 | 4% |
| Italy | 1 | 4% |
| Australia | 1 | 4% |
| Germany | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 7 | 27% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 20 | 77% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 12% |
| Scientists | 2 | 8% |
| Unknown | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 305 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Portugal | 2 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 2 | <1% |
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 295 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 42 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 38 | 12% |
| Other | 35 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 31 | 10% |
| Researcher | 26 | 9% |
| Other | 77 | 25% |
| Unknown | 56 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 97 | 32% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 71 | 23% |
| Sports and Recreations | 17 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 11 | 4% |
| Psychology | 11 | 4% |
| Other | 29 | 10% |
| Unknown | 69 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 34. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 February 2019.
All research outputs
#1,165,351
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Spine Journal
#95
of 3,852 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,492
of 226,308 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Spine Journal
#8
of 296 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,852 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 226,308 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 296 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.