| Title |
All Fish for China?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Ambio, November 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s13280-013-0448-9 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sebastián Villasante, David Rodríguez-González, Manel Antelo, Susana Rivero-Rodríguez, José A. de Santiago, Gonzalo Macho |
| Abstract |
In this paper we examine the effect of Gross Domestic Product (GDP) on the level of fish intake in China in comparison with the rest of the world. We also analyse the origin and destination of China's seafood products in order to understand the main patterns during the last decades. The results show that in the 1961-2011 period the rate of growth of the GDP in China doubled that of other developing regions, while the daily fish intake of China increased fourfold, making China the largest fish consumer in the world. Given the size and scale of China's role in production, consumption, and global transformation of seafood markets, China is shaping a new era of industrialization in the history of the fishing industry. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 27 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 4 | 15% |
| United States | 3 | 11% |
| France | 2 | 7% |
| Colombia | 1 | 4% |
| Argentina | 1 | 4% |
| Ireland | 1 | 4% |
| Canada | 1 | 4% |
| Sweden | 1 | 4% |
| Italy | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 12 | 44% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 21 | 78% |
| Scientists | 5 | 19% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 79 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 2 | 3% |
| Bangladesh | 1 | 1% |
| Sweden | 1 | 1% |
| Malaysia | 1 | 1% |
| Canada | 1 | 1% |
| United States | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 72 | 91% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 10 | 13% |
| Researcher | 10 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 8% |
| Other | 12 | 15% |
| Unknown | 23 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 16 | 20% |
| Environmental Science | 13 | 16% |
| Social Sciences | 8 | 10% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 4 | 5% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 11 | 14% |
| Unknown | 25 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 October 2020.
All research outputs
#1,876,733
of 25,147,320 outputs
Outputs from Ambio
#325
of 1,779 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,170
of 222,563 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ambio
#3
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,147,320 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,779 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 222,563 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.