↓ Skip to main content

Boosted objects and jet substructure at the LHC. Report of BOOST2012, held at IFIC Valencia, 23rd–27th of July 2012

Overview of attention for article published in The European Physical Journal C, March 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
124 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
20 Mendeley
Title
Boosted objects and jet substructure at the LHC. Report of BOOST2012, held at IFIC Valencia, 23rd–27th of July 2012
Published in
The European Physical Journal C, March 2014
DOI 10.1140/epjc/s10052-014-2792-8
Authors

A. Altheimer, A. Arce, L. Asquith, J. Backus Mayes, E. Bergeaas Kuutmann, J. Berger, D. Bjergaard, L. Bryngemark, A. Buckley, J. Butterworth, M. Cacciari, M. Campanelli, T. Carli, M. Chala, B. Chapleau, C. Chen, J. P. Chou, Th. Cornelissen, D. Curtin, M. Dasgupta, A. Davison, F. de Almeida Dias, A. de Cosa, A. de Roeck, C. Debenedetti, C. Doglioni, S. D. Ellis, F. Fassi, J. Ferrando, S. Fleischmann, M. Freytsis, M. L. Gonzalez Silva, S. Gonzalez de la Hoz, F. Guescini, Z. Han, A. Hook, A. Hornig, E. Izaguirre, M. Jankowiak, J. Juknevich, M. Kaci, D. Kar, G. Kasieczka, R. Kogler, A. Larkoski, P. Loch, D. Lopez Mateos, S. Marzani, L. Masetti, V. Mateu, D. W. Miller, K. Mishra, P. Nef, K. Nordstrom, E. Oliver Garcia, J. Penwell, J. Pilot, T. Plehn, S. Rappoccio, A. Rizzi, G. Rodrigo, A. Safonov, G. P. Salam, J. Salt, S. Schaetzel, M. Schioppa, A. Schmidt, J. Scholtz, A. Schwartzman, M. D. Schwartz, M. Segala, M. Son, G. Soyez, M. Spannowsky, I. Stewart, D. Strom, M. Swiatlowski, V. Sanchez Martinez, M. Takeuchi, J. Thaler, E. N. Thompson, N. V. Tran, C. Vermilion, M. Villaplana, M. Vos, J. Wacker, J. Walsh

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 20 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 30%
Researcher 5 25%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 5%
Student > Bachelor 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Other 4 20%
Unknown 2 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 14 70%
Computer Science 2 10%
Social Sciences 1 5%
Unknown 3 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 November 2013.
All research outputs
#16,282,309
of 25,711,518 outputs
Outputs from The European Physical Journal C
#2,377
of 9,133 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#129,736
of 238,011 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The European Physical Journal C
#12
of 112 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,711,518 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,133 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 238,011 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 112 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.