You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Participatory Workplace Interventions Can Reduce Sedentary Time for Office Workers—A Randomised Controlled Trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, November 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0078957 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sharon Parry, Leon Straker, Nicholas D. Gilson, Anne J. Smith |
| Abstract |
Occupational sedentary behaviour is an important contributor to overall sedentary risk. There is limited evidence for effective workplace interventions to reduce occupational sedentary time and increase light activity during work hours. The purpose of the study was to determine if participatory workplace interventions could reduce total sedentary time, sustained sedentary time (bouts >30 minutes), increase the frequency of breaks in sedentary time and promote light intensity activity and moderate/vigorous activity (MVPA) during work hours. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 5 | 31% |
| Canada | 2 | 13% |
| United States | 2 | 13% |
| Australia | 2 | 13% |
| Unknown | 5 | 31% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 9 | 56% |
| Scientists | 5 | 31% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 388 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 4 | 1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Austria | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Poland | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 378 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 69 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 58 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 49 | 13% |
| Researcher | 35 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 21 | 5% |
| Other | 64 | 16% |
| Unknown | 92 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 57 | 15% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 53 | 14% |
| Sports and Recreations | 51 | 13% |
| Psychology | 36 | 9% |
| Social Sciences | 28 | 7% |
| Other | 64 | 16% |
| Unknown | 99 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 41. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 March 2020.
All research outputs
#979,854
of 24,917,903 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#12,798
of 216,024 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,717
of 219,132 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#366
of 5,141 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,917,903 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 216,024 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 219,132 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5,141 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.