| Title |
Efficacy of a Carrageenan nasal spray in patients with common cold: a randomized controlled trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Respiratory Research, November 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1465-9921-14-124 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Martin Ludwig, Elisabeth Enzenhofer, Sven Schneider, Margit Rauch, Angelika Bodenteich, Kurt Neumann, Eva Prieschl-Grassauer, Andreas Grassauer, Thomas Lion, Christian A Mueller |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 12% |
| Canada | 2 | 12% |
| United States | 2 | 12% |
| France | 1 | 6% |
| Turkey | 1 | 6% |
| Malaysia | 1 | 6% |
| Norway | 1 | 6% |
| India | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 6 | 35% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 13 | 76% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 12% |
| Scientists | 2 | 12% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 124 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 123 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 25 | 20% |
| Student > Bachelor | 16 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 13 | 10% |
| Other | 9 | 7% |
| Other | 17 | 14% |
| Unknown | 30 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 24 | 19% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 16 | 13% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 12 | 10% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 10 | 8% |
| Chemistry | 8 | 6% |
| Other | 22 | 18% |
| Unknown | 32 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 58. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 October 2023.
All research outputs
#746,177
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Respiratory Research
#51
of 3,107 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,326
of 228,955 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Respiratory Research
#1
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,107 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 228,955 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.