↓ Skip to main content

Mock-up in hip arthroplasty pre-operative planning.

Overview of attention for article published in Acta of Bioengineering & Biomechanics, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
10 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Mock-up in hip arthroplasty pre-operative planning.
Published in
Acta of Bioengineering & Biomechanics, January 2013
Pubmed ID
Authors

Elisabetta M Zanetti, Cristina Bignardi

Abstract

The correct estimation of stem boundary conditions in hip arthroplasty cannot be performed simply by subtracting the prosthesis volume from the bone volume: the stem implant path needs to be taken into account. Digital mock-up is a technique commonly applied in the automotive field which can be used for this aim. Given a certain femur, a stem, and an implantation path, the volume of the removed bone stock can be evaluated, as well as the final contact area between the bone and the stem, and, section by section, the residual cortical bone thickness. The technique proved to be useful: if the stem implant path is not considered, the removed bone stock volume can be underestimated up to 6%, while the contact area extension can be overestimated up to 28%. On the whole, a new methodology has been set up and tested, which can be usefully employed to accurately establish stem boundary conditions in the pre-operative planning stage, and in order to perform a reliable structural stress analysis. The methodology implemented here by experienced researchers can be made available to surgeons, setting up an apposite software suite.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Norway 2 20%
Unknown 8 80%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 40%
Student > Bachelor 3 30%
Lecturer 1 10%
Unknown 2 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 4 40%
Engineering 2 20%
Sports and Recreations 1 10%
Mathematics 1 10%
Unknown 2 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 November 2013.
All research outputs
#20,660,571
of 25,377,790 outputs
Outputs from Acta of Bioengineering & Biomechanics
#52
of 83 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#228,830
of 289,014 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Acta of Bioengineering & Biomechanics
#3
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,377,790 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 83 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.0. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 289,014 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.