↓ Skip to main content

Long-term effect of motivational interviewing on clinical and psychological outcomes and health-related quality of life in cardiac rehabilitation patients with poor motivation in Hong Kong: a…

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Rehabilitation, July 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
25 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
116 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Long-term effect of motivational interviewing on clinical and psychological outcomes and health-related quality of life in cardiac rehabilitation patients with poor motivation in Hong Kong: a randomized controlled trial
Published in
Clinical Rehabilitation, July 2013
DOI 10.1177/0269215513490527
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sek Ying Chair, Sally Wai-Chi Chan, David R Thompson, Kei-Pui Leung, Samuel Ka-Chiu Ng, Kai Chow Choi

Abstract

To investigate the long-term effects of motivational interviewing on clinical outcomes, psychological outcomes, health-related quality of life among cardiac rehabilitation patients with poor motivation.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 116 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 2%
Unknown 114 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 26 22%
Researcher 13 11%
Student > Master 13 11%
Student > Bachelor 12 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 5%
Other 23 20%
Unknown 23 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 29 25%
Medicine and Dentistry 24 21%
Psychology 14 12%
Social Sciences 9 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 3%
Other 12 10%
Unknown 25 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 November 2013.
All research outputs
#18,353,475
of 22,729,647 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Rehabilitation
#1,634
of 1,844 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#145,926
of 194,376 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Rehabilitation
#30
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,729,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,844 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.4. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 194,376 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.