↓ Skip to main content

Vascular factors in diabetic neuropathy

Overview of attention for article published in Diabetologia, September 1994
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
patent
1 patent
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
187 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
44 Mendeley
Title
Vascular factors in diabetic neuropathy
Published in
Diabetologia, September 1994
DOI 10.1007/bf00400938
Pubmed ID
Authors

S. Tesfaye, R. Malik, J. D. Ward

Abstract

Despite considerable research we still do not have a comprehensive explanation for the pathogenesis of diabetic neuropathy. Although chronic hyperglycaemia is almost certainly involved, it is not known whether the primary pathology is metabolic, microvascular, or an interaction between the two. Hyperglycaemia-induced polyol pathway hyperactivity associated with nerve sorbitol accumulation and myo-inositol depletion may play a part in the genesis of diabetic neuropathy. The case for microvascular disease in diabetic neuropathy is now strong. Fibre loss in human sural nerve is multifocal, suggesting ischaemia. The degree of vessel disease has been related to the severity of neuropathy. People with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease develop the so called "hypoxic neuropathy" in which similar microvascular changes occur as in diabetic neuropathy. In rats with experimental diabetic neuropathy nerve blood flow is reduced and oxygen supplementation or vasodilator treatment improved the deterioration in conduction velocity and nerve blood flow. Similarly, in human diabetic neuropathy, there is impaired nerve blood flow, epineurial arterio-venous shunting and a reduction in sural nerve oxygen tension. At what stage during the development of nerve damage these changes occur is yet to be determined.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 44 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
Bulgaria 1 2%
Canada 1 2%
Unknown 41 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 16%
Student > Postgraduate 6 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 9%
Other 4 9%
Researcher 4 9%
Other 9 20%
Unknown 10 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 13 30%
Neuroscience 6 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 7%
Mathematics 1 2%
Other 4 9%
Unknown 14 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2019.
All research outputs
#3,656,555
of 22,729,647 outputs
Outputs from Diabetologia
#1,673
of 5,032 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,172
of 21,534 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Diabetologia
#3
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,729,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,032 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 21,534 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.