↓ Skip to main content

How to simultaneously optimize muscle strength, power, functional capacity, and cardiovascular gains in the elderly: an update

Overview of attention for article published in GeroScience, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
19 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
70 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
302 Mendeley
Title
How to simultaneously optimize muscle strength, power, functional capacity, and cardiovascular gains in the elderly: an update
Published in
GeroScience, January 2013
DOI 10.1007/s11357-012-9503-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Cadore EL, Izquierdo M

Abstract

The purpose of the present study was to review the scientific literature that investigated concurrent training adaptations in elderly populations, with the aim of identifying the optimal combination of both training program variables (i.e., strength and endurance) to avoid or minimize the interference effect in the elderly. Scielo, Science Citation Index, MEDLINE, Scopus, SPORTDiscus, and ScienceDirect databases were searched. Concurrent training is the most effective strategy by which to improve neuromuscular and cardiorespiratory functions as well as functional capacity in the elderly. The volume and frequency of training appears to play a critical role in concurrent training-induced adaptations in elderly subjects. Furthermore, new evidence indicates that the intra-session exercise order may influence the magnitude of physiological adaptations. Despite the interference effect on strength gains that is caused by concurrent training, this type of training is advantageous in that the combination of strength and endurance training produces both neuromuscular and cardiovascular adaptations in the elderly. The interference phenomenon may be observed in elderly subjects when a moderate weekly volume of concurrent training (i.e., three times per week) is performed. However, even with the occurrence of this phenomenon, the performance of three concurrent training sessions per week appears to optimize the strength gains in relative brief periods of training (12 weeks). Moreover, performing strength prior to endurance exercise may optimize both neuromuscular and cardiovascular gains.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 302 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 299 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 51 17%
Student > Bachelor 47 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 35 12%
Student > Postgraduate 23 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 23 8%
Other 59 20%
Unknown 64 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 92 30%
Medicine and Dentistry 41 14%
Nursing and Health Professions 35 12%
Social Sciences 12 4%
Neuroscience 7 2%
Other 33 11%
Unknown 82 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 March 2023.
All research outputs
#2,716,307
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from GeroScience
#352
of 1,594 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,231
of 288,801 outputs
Outputs of similar age from GeroScience
#5
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,594 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 288,801 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.