Title |
Delayed diagnosis and associated factors among new pulmonary tuberculosis patients diagnosed at the emergency department of a tertiary care hospital in Porto Alegre, South Brazil: a prospective patient recruitment study
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Infectious Diseases, November 2013
|
DOI | 10.1186/1471-2334-13-538 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Gracieli Nadalon Deponti, Denise Rossato Silva, Ana Cláudia Coelho, Alice Mânica Muller, Paulo de Tarso Roth Dalcin |
Abstract |
Control of tuberculosis (TB) depends on early diagnosis and treatment at the primary health care level. However, many patients are still diagnosed late with TB at hospitals. The present study aimed to investigate the delay in diagnosis of TB patients at the emergency department. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Singapore | 1 | 50% |
United States | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 101 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 101 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 16 | 16% |
Student > Master | 13 | 13% |
Student > Bachelor | 13 | 13% |
Student > Postgraduate | 8 | 8% |
Other | 7 | 7% |
Other | 24 | 24% |
Unknown | 20 | 20% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 43 | 43% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 10 | 10% |
Social Sciences | 7 | 7% |
Arts and Humanities | 3 | 3% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 2% |
Other | 11 | 11% |
Unknown | 25 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 November 2013.
All research outputs
#15,284,663
of 22,729,647 outputs
Outputs from BMC Infectious Diseases
#4,442
of 7,662 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#130,421
of 212,391 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Infectious Diseases
#72
of 127 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,729,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,662 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.6. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 212,391 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 127 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.