↓ Skip to main content

Exercise and the Treatment of Clinical Depression in Adults

Overview of attention for article published in Sports Medicine, October 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
policy
4 policy sources

Citations

dimensions_citation
374 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
331 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Exercise and the Treatment of Clinical Depression in Adults
Published in
Sports Medicine, October 2012
DOI 10.2165/00007256-200232120-00001
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alisha L. Brosse, Erin S. Sheets, Heather S. Lett, James A. Blumenthal

Abstract

This article critically reviews the evidence that exercise is effective in treating depression in adults. Depression is recognised as a mood state, clinical syndrome and psychiatric condition, and traditional methods for assessing depression (e.g. standard interviews, questionnaires) are described. In order to place exercise therapy into context, more established methods for treating clinical depression are discussed. Observational (e.g. cross-sectional and correlational) and interventional studies of exercise are reviewed in healthy adults, those with comorbid medical conditions, and patients with major depression. Potential mechanisms by which exercise may reduce depression are described, and directions for future research in the area are suggested. The available evidence provides considerable support for the value of exercise in reducing depressive symptoms in both healthy and clinical populations. However, many studies have significant methodological limitations. Thus, more data from carefully conducted clinical trials are needed before exercise can be recommended as an alternative to more traditional, empirically validated pharmacological and behavioural therapies.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 331 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 2 <1%
United States 2 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 323 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 77 23%
Student > Master 52 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 40 12%
Researcher 36 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 21 6%
Other 46 14%
Unknown 59 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 77 23%
Medicine and Dentistry 50 15%
Sports and Recreations 48 15%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 23 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 22 7%
Other 42 13%
Unknown 69 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 December 2018.
All research outputs
#1,811,439
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Sports Medicine
#1,307
of 2,874 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,020
of 202,119 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Sports Medicine
#226
of 979 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,874 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 56.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 202,119 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 979 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.