| Title |
Norms on the gender perception of role nouns in Czech, English, French, German, Italian, Norwegian, and Slovak
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Behavior Research Methods, October 2013
|
| DOI | 10.3758/s13428-013-0409-z |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Julia Misersky, Pascal M. Gygax, Paolo Canal, Ute Gabriel, Alan Garnham, Friederike Braun, Tania Chiarini, Kjellrun Englund, Adriana Hanulikova, Anton Öttl, Jana Valdrova, Lisa Von Stockhausen, Sabine Sczesny |
| Abstract |
We collected norms on the gender stereotypicality of an extensive list of role nouns in Czech, English, French, German, Italian, Norwegian, and Slovak, to be used as a basis for the selection of stimulus materials in future studies. We present a Web-based tool (available at https://www.unifr.ch/lcg/ ) that we developed to collect these norms and that we expect to be useful for other researchers, as well. In essence, we provide (a) gender stereotypicality norms across a number of languages and (b) a tool to facilitate cross-language as well as cross-cultural comparisons when researchers are interested in the investigation of the impact of stereotypicality on the processing of role nouns. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 84 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 83 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 16 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 15 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 14% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 7% |
| Researcher | 6 | 7% |
| Other | 11 | 13% |
| Unknown | 18 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 38 | 45% |
| Linguistics | 13 | 15% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 6% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 5 | 6% |
| Unknown | 16 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 September 2016.
All research outputs
#17,286,645
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Behavior Research Methods
#1,635
of 2,525 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#140,710
of 224,849 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Behavior Research Methods
#11
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,525 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 224,849 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.