↓ Skip to main content

Current status and new features of the Consensus Coding Sequence database

Overview of attention for article published in Nucleic Acids Research, November 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (61st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
135 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
109 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Current status and new features of the Consensus Coding Sequence database
Published in
Nucleic Acids Research, November 2013
DOI 10.1093/nar/gkt1059
Pubmed ID
Authors

Catherine M. Farrell, Nuala A. O’Leary, Rachel A. Harte, Jane E. Loveland, Laurens G. Wilming, Craig Wallin, Mark Diekhans, Daniel Barrell, Stephen M. J. Searle, Bronwen Aken, Susan M. Hiatt, Adam Frankish, Marie-Marthe Suner, Bhanu Rajput, Charles A. Steward, Garth R. Brown, Ruth Bennett, Michael Murphy, Wendy Wu, Mike P. Kay, Jennifer Hart, Jeena Rajan, Janet Weber, Catherine Snow, Lillian D. Riddick, Toby Hunt, David Webb, Mark Thomas, Pamela Tamez, Sanjida H. Rangwala, Kelly M. McGarvey, Shashikant Pujar, Andrei Shkeda, Jonathan M. Mudge, Jose M. Gonzalez, James G. R. Gilbert, Stephen J. Trevanion, Robert Baertsch, Jennifer L. Harrow, Tim Hubbard, James M. Ostell, David Haussler, Kim D. Pruitt

Abstract

The Consensus Coding Sequence (CCDS) project (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/CCDS/) is a collaborative effort to maintain a dataset of protein-coding regions that are identically annotated on the human and mouse reference genome assemblies by the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) and Ensembl genome annotation pipelines. Identical annotations that pass quality assurance tests are tracked with a stable identifier (CCDS ID). Members of the collaboration, who are from NCBI, the Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute and the University of California Santa Cruz, provide coordinated and continuous review of the dataset to ensure high-quality CCDS representations. We describe here the current status and recent growth in the CCDS dataset, as well as recent changes to the CCDS web and FTP sites. These changes include more explicit reporting about the NCBI and Ensembl annotation releases being compared, new search and display options, the addition of biologically descriptive information and our approach to representing genes for which support evidence is incomplete. We also present a summary of recent and future curation targets.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 109 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 3%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Unknown 100 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 28 26%
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 19%
Student > Master 11 10%
Student > Bachelor 7 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 6%
Other 24 22%
Unknown 11 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 39 36%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 31 28%
Computer Science 8 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 5%
Mathematics 3 3%
Other 7 6%
Unknown 16 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 April 2015.
All research outputs
#6,127,359
of 22,731,677 outputs
Outputs from Nucleic Acids Research
#10,673
of 26,313 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#55,863
of 212,947 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nucleic Acids Research
#152
of 408 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,731,677 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 26,313 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 212,947 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 408 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.