↓ Skip to main content

Relation of Childhood Diet and Body Size to Menarche and Adolescent Growth in Girls

Overview of attention for article published in American Journal of Epidemiology, September 2000
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
3 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
187 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
136 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Relation of Childhood Diet and Body Size to Menarche and Adolescent Growth in Girls
Published in
American Journal of Epidemiology, September 2000
DOI 10.1093/aje/152.5.446
Pubmed ID
Authors

C S Berkey, J D Gardner, A L Frazier, G A Colditz

Abstract

Adolescent growth and development may be affected by factors such as dietary intake and body size from much earlier in childhood. In a longitudinal study of 67 Caucasian girls in Boston, Massachusetts, data were collected prospectively from birth during the 1930s and 1940s. Heights and weights were measured semiannually, and dietary history interviews were conducted with mothers. Stepwise linear regression methods were used to seek factors which best predicted age at menarche, adolescent peak height growth velocity, and the age at which peak growth velocity occurred. Girls who consumed more (energy-adjusted) animal protein and less vegetable protein at ages 3-5 years had earlier menarche, and girls aged 1-2 years with higher dietary fat intakes and girls aged 6-8 years with higher animal protein intakes became adolescents with earlier peak growth. Controlling for body size, girls who consumed more calories and animal protein 2 years before peak growth had higher peak growth velocity. These findings may have implications regarding adult diseases whose risks are associated with adolescent growth and development factors.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 136 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 1%
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 133 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 20 15%
Student > Bachelor 18 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 12%
Researcher 14 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 7%
Other 22 16%
Unknown 37 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 35 26%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 17 13%
Social Sciences 9 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 5%
Other 20 15%
Unknown 41 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 August 2020.
All research outputs
#6,754,462
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from American Journal of Epidemiology
#4,448
of 8,994 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,445
of 37,744 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Journal of Epidemiology
#26
of 48 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,994 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 37,744 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 48 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.