↓ Skip to main content

New therapeutic approaches for protecting hematopoietic stem cells in aplastic anemia

Overview of attention for article published in Immunologic Research, November 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
21 Mendeley
Title
New therapeutic approaches for protecting hematopoietic stem cells in aplastic anemia
Published in
Immunologic Research, November 2013
DOI 10.1007/s12026-013-8449-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Wendy Weston, Vineet Gupta, Rebecca Adkins, Roland Jurecic

Abstract

Aplastic anemia (AA) is an immune-mediated and life-threatening form of acquired bone marrow failure (BMF), characterized by development and expansion of self-reactive T cells. These T cells cause continuous destruction of hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs), progenitors, and mature blood cells, leading to severe and if left untreated fatal marrow hypoplasia and pancytopenia. Standard treatment options for patients with AA include: (1) immunosuppressive therapy (IST) with anti-thymocyte globulin and cyclosporine A which targets self-reactive T cells, or (2) matched sibling or unrelated BM transplant (BMT). The IST treatment is often not effective due to poor response to therapy or disease relapse after IST. Also, BMT is not an option for many patients due to their age, comorbidities, and the lack of histocompatible donor. This necessitates development and testing of novel approaches to reduce severity of AA and to efficiently treat patients with refractory and relapsed AA. Immune-mediated AA was reproduced in animals, including mouse lymphocyte infusion models, which are used to study further etiology and pathophysiology of AA and test new drugs and approaches in treating and managing AA. In these mouse models the immune correlates and pathologic features of AA are strikingly similar to features of severe human AA. In this article we (a) briefly review standard and developing approaches for treating AA and (b) describe development and testing of novel treatment approach with a potential to safely reduce BM hypoplasia and significantly decrease the loss of HSCs in mouse lymphocyte infusion model of AA.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 21 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 4 19%
Student > Master 3 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 10%
Professor 2 10%
Student > Bachelor 2 10%
Other 6 29%
Unknown 2 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 5 24%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 19%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 14%
Engineering 2 10%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 10%
Other 3 14%
Unknown 2 10%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 November 2013.
All research outputs
#18,354,532
of 22,731,677 outputs
Outputs from Immunologic Research
#661
of 905 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#160,729
of 215,945 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Immunologic Research
#15
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,731,677 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 905 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.0. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 215,945 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.