| Title |
Resilience and Challenges of Marine Social–Ecological Systems Under Complex and Interconnected Drivers
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Ambio, November 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s13280-013-0450-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sebastián Villasante, Gonzalo Macho, Manel Antelo, David Rodríguez-González, Michel J. Kaiser |
| Abstract |
In this paper, we summarize the contributions made by an interdisciplinary group of researchers from different disciplines (biology, ecology, economics, and law) that deal with key dimensions of marine social-ecological systems. Particularly, the local and global seafood provision; the feasibility and management of marine protected areas; the use of marine ecosystem services; the institutional dimension in European fisheries, and the affordable models for providing scientific advice to small-scale fisheries. This Special Issue presents key findings from selected case studies around the world available to educators, policy makers, and the technical community. Together, these papers show that a range of diverse ecological, economic, social, and institutional components often mutually interact at spatial and temporal scales, which evidence that managing marine social-ecological systems needs a continuous adaptability to navigate into new governance systems. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Sweden | 2 | 29% |
| Bosnia and Herzegovina | 1 | 14% |
| Spain | 1 | 14% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 2 | 29% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 71% |
| Scientists | 2 | 29% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 120 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 3% |
| Malaysia | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Chile | 1 | <1% |
| Sweden | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 108 | 90% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 25 | 21% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 22 | 18% |
| Researcher | 18 | 15% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 10 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 5% |
| Other | 23 | 19% |
| Unknown | 16 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 44 | 37% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 17 | 14% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 10 | 8% |
| Social Sciences | 10 | 8% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 13 | 11% |
| Unknown | 22 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 November 2016.
All research outputs
#7,061,613
of 23,577,654 outputs
Outputs from Ambio
#988
of 1,667 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#64,050
of 216,862 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ambio
#11
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,654 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,667 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.4. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 216,862 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.