↓ Skip to main content

Evidence for myofibril remodeling as opposed to myofibril damage in human muscles with DOMS: an ultrastructural and immunoelectron microscopic study

Overview of attention for article published in Histochemistry and Cell Biology, February 2004
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
9 X users
video
3 YouTube creators

Citations

dimensions_citation
141 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
152 Mendeley
connotea
1 Connotea
Title
Evidence for myofibril remodeling as opposed to myofibril damage in human muscles with DOMS: an ultrastructural and immunoelectron microscopic study
Published in
Histochemistry and Cell Biology, February 2004
DOI 10.1007/s00418-004-0625-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ji-Guo Yu, Lena Carlsson, Lars-Eric Thornell

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 152 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 3 2%
Portugal 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Hungary 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
Greece 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 141 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 27 18%
Student > Master 25 16%
Student > Bachelor 16 11%
Researcher 15 10%
Professor 12 8%
Other 29 19%
Unknown 28 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 44 29%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 21 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 21 14%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 13 9%
Engineering 5 3%
Other 13 9%
Unknown 35 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 December 2022.
All research outputs
#6,493,896
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Histochemistry and Cell Biology
#237
of 1,266 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,491
of 64,471 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Histochemistry and Cell Biology
#1
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,266 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 64,471 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them