↓ Skip to main content

Failure to replicate the Mehta and Zhu (2009) color-priming effect on anagram solution times

Overview of attention for article published in Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, November 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
peer_reviews
1 peer review site

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
35 Mendeley
Title
Failure to replicate the Mehta and Zhu (2009) color-priming effect on anagram solution times
Published in
Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, November 2013
DOI 10.3758/s13423-013-0548-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kenneth M. Steele

Abstract

Mehta and Zhu (Science, 323, 1226-1229, 2009) hypothesized that the color red induces avoidance motivation and that the color blue induces approach motivation. In one experiment, they reported that anagrams of avoidance motivation words were solved more quickly on red backgrounds and that approach motivation anagrams were solved more quickly on blue backgrounds. Reported here is a direct replication of that experiment, using the same anagrams, instructions, and colors, with more than triple the number of participants used in the original study. The results did not show the Mehta and Zhu color-priming effects, even though statistical power was sufficient to detect the effect. The results call into question the existence of their color-priming effect on the solution of anagrams.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 35 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 3%
Unknown 34 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 8 23%
Researcher 8 23%
Student > Bachelor 7 20%
Other 3 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 6%
Other 5 14%
Unknown 2 6%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 18 51%
Business, Management and Accounting 4 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 6%
Computer Science 1 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 3%
Other 5 14%
Unknown 4 11%