| Title |
Measuring the nature and duration of symptoms of cervical cancer in young women: developing an interview-based approach
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Women's Health, November 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1472-6874-13-45 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Anita WW Lim, Lindsay JL Forbes, Adam N Rosenthal, Kantipati S Raju, Amanda-Jane Ramirez |
| Abstract |
Some young women experience delays in diagnosis of cervical cancer, but little research about ways of studying these delays has been published. A major challenge is that gynaecological symptoms are common in young women, but cervical cancer is rare. This study describes the development and testing of a measure for studying delays in diagnosis in young women with cervical cancer. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 55 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 55 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 7 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 13% |
| Researcher | 6 | 11% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 6 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 9% |
| Other | 12 | 22% |
| Unknown | 12 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 19 | 35% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 11 | 20% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 5% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 2% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 2 | 4% |
| Unknown | 18 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 January 2020.
All research outputs
#2,407,495
of 22,731,677 outputs
Outputs from BMC Women's Health
#220
of 1,793 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,556
of 212,391 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Women's Health
#2
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,731,677 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,793 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 212,391 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.