↓ Skip to main content

Use of alternative and complementary therapies in labor and delivery care: a cross-sectional study of midwives’ training in Catalan hospitals accredited as centers for normal birth

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies, November 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (69th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
128 Mendeley
Title
Use of alternative and complementary therapies in labor and delivery care: a cross-sectional study of midwives’ training in Catalan hospitals accredited as centers for normal birth
Published in
BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies, November 2013
DOI 10.1186/1472-6882-13-318
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ester Muñoz-Sellés, Antoni Vallès-Segalés, Josefina Goberna-Tricas

Abstract

The use of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) and complementary and alternative therapies (CAT) during pregnancy is increasing. Scientific evidence for CAM and CAT in the field of obstetrics mainly covers pain relief in labor. Midwives are responsible for labor and delivery care: hence, their knowledge of CAM and CAT is important. The aims of this study are to describe the professional profile of midwives who provide care for natural childbirth in Catalan hospitals accredited as centers for normal birth, to assess midwives' level of training in CAT and their use of these therapies, and to identify specific resources for CAT in labor wards.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 128 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Unknown 125 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 24 19%
Student > Bachelor 20 16%
Researcher 13 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 7%
Student > Postgraduate 7 5%
Other 26 20%
Unknown 29 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 40 31%
Nursing and Health Professions 29 23%
Social Sciences 7 5%
Neuroscience 3 2%
Psychology 3 2%
Other 12 9%
Unknown 34 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 February 2014.
All research outputs
#6,770,149
of 22,731,677 outputs
Outputs from BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies
#1,076
of 3,620 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#61,818
of 211,390 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies
#28
of 92 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,731,677 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,620 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 211,390 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 92 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.