↓ Skip to main content

Spontaneous EEG fluctuations determine the readiness potential: is preconscious brain activation a preparation process to move?

Overview of attention for article published in Experimental Brain Research, October 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
3 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
googleplus
2 Google+ users

Citations

dimensions_citation
45 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
134 Mendeley
Title
Spontaneous EEG fluctuations determine the readiness potential: is preconscious brain activation a preparation process to move?
Published in
Experimental Brain Research, October 2013
DOI 10.1007/s00221-013-3713-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Han-Gue Jo, Thilo Hinterberger, Marc Wittmann, Tilmann Lhündrup Borghardt, Stefan Schmidt

Abstract

It has been repeatedly shown that specific brain activity related to planning movement develops before the conscious intention to act. This empirical finding strongly challenges the notion of free will. Here, we demonstrate that in the Libet experiment, spontaneous fluctuations of the slow electro-cortical potentials (SCPs) account for a significant fraction of the readiness potential (RP). The individual potential shifts preceding self-initiated movements were classified as showing a negative or positive shift. The negative and positive potential shifts were analyzed in a self-initiated movement condition and in a no-movement condition. Comparing the potential shifts between both conditions, we observed no differences in the early part of the potential. This reveals that the apparently negative RP emerges through an unequal ratio of negative and positive potential shifts. These results suggest that ongoing negative shifts of the SCPs facilitate self-initiated movement but are not related to processes underlying preparation or decision to act.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 134 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 1%
Germany 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 126 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 31 23%
Researcher 22 16%
Student > Master 21 16%
Student > Bachelor 19 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 4%
Other 19 14%
Unknown 16 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 44 33%
Neuroscience 26 19%
Medicine and Dentistry 11 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 7%
Linguistics 5 4%
Other 17 13%
Unknown 22 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 May 2018.
All research outputs
#2,178,801
of 23,864,690 outputs
Outputs from Experimental Brain Research
#141
of 3,303 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,265
of 212,420 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Experimental Brain Research
#2
of 41 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,864,690 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,303 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 212,420 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 41 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.