↓ Skip to main content

Biological motion stimuli are attractive to medaka fish

Overview of attention for article published in Animal Cognition, October 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users
peer_reviews
1 peer review site
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
58 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
108 Mendeley
Title
Biological motion stimuli are attractive to medaka fish
Published in
Animal Cognition, October 2013
DOI 10.1007/s10071-013-0687-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tomohiro Nakayasu, Eiji Watanabe

Abstract

In many social fish species, visual cues play an important role in inducing shoaling behaviour. The present study is the first to examine whether and how "biological motion" depicting a moving creature by means of only a small number of isolated points induces shoaling behaviour in fish. Medaka (Oryzias latipes) were used because they are known to have high visual acuity and exhibit a strong tendency to form shoals. In experiment 1, we found that the presentation of medaka biological motion resulted in heightened shoaling behaviour when compared with that of non-biological motion (depicted by a small number of points placed at fixed distances that moved at a constant speed in a constant direction). In experiment 2, it was indicated that medaka biological motion was more effective at inducing shoaling behaviour when compared with human biological motion. In experiment 3, it was demonstrated that shoaling behaviour was largely dependent on the smoothness of the biological motion. In experiment 4, we revealed that shoaling behaviour was maximised in normal speed group and decreased in faster- and slower-than-normal speed groups. In experiment 5, it was shown that shoaling behaviour was slightly reduced when a reversed movie was presented. These results suggest that motion information extracted from conspecifics was sufficient to induce shoaling behaviour in medaka and that deviation from normal and familiar motion impeded shoaling behaviour. The naturalness of motion may be responsible for the induction of shoaling behaviour.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 108 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Portugal 3 3%
Hungary 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 100 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 23 21%
Student > Bachelor 20 19%
Researcher 17 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 6%
Other 18 17%
Unknown 8 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 51 47%
Psychology 13 12%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 8%
Neuroscience 7 6%
Computer Science 5 5%
Other 11 10%
Unknown 12 11%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 May 2020.
All research outputs
#6,371,272
of 23,504,694 outputs
Outputs from Animal Cognition
#850
of 1,482 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#56,944
of 213,403 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Animal Cognition
#15
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,504,694 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,482 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.9. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 213,403 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.