You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Linking regional planning and local action: Towards using social network analysis in systematic conservation planning
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Biological Conservation, January 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.biocon.2013.10.015 |
| Authors |
Morena Mills, Jorge G. Álvarez-Romero, Ken Vance-Borland, Philippa Cohen, Robert L. Pressey, Angela M. Guerrero, Henrik Ernstson |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 13% |
| Spain | 2 | 13% |
| Canada | 2 | 13% |
| Mexico | 1 | 7% |
| Australia | 1 | 7% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 7% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 7% |
| Portugal | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 4 | 27% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 9 | 60% |
| Members of the public | 5 | 33% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 514 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 3 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | <1% |
| Mexico | 2 | <1% |
| Australia | 2 | <1% |
| Spain | 2 | <1% |
| Finland | 2 | <1% |
| Ecuador | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 9 | 2% |
| Unknown | 484 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 125 | 24% |
| Researcher | 88 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 85 | 17% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 33 | 6% |
| Student > Bachelor | 26 | 5% |
| Other | 84 | 16% |
| Unknown | 73 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 196 | 38% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 98 | 19% |
| Social Sciences | 49 | 10% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 17 | 3% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 9 | 2% |
| Other | 39 | 8% |
| Unknown | 106 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 February 2018.
All research outputs
#2,156,529
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Biological Conservation
#1,715
of 6,612 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,017
of 319,290 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biological Conservation
#23
of 85 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,612 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 319,290 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 85 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.