↓ Skip to main content

Teleconsultation from a secondary hospital for paediatric emergencies occurring at rural hospitals in Queensland

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare, November 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
89 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Teleconsultation from a secondary hospital for paediatric emergencies occurring at rural hospitals in Queensland
Published in
Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare, November 2013
DOI 10.1177/1357633x13506528
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sachin Desai, Michael L Williams, Anthony C Smith

Abstract

We reviewed telehealth consultations for acute paediatric patients presenting at rural sites in the Mackay district in 2012. Patient data and outcomes were collected prospectively, and a survey of the referring clinicians was undertaken. Thirty four patient consultations were conducted via telehealth with 14 referring clinicians. Most of the referrals were for respiratory illnesses, including bronchiolitis. We received feedback surveys for 16 consultations (57% response rate). In 47% of the cases, the paediatric team felt that transfer was avoided by using teleconsultation. In 80% of consultations, the referring clinicians felt that video consultation was more effective than telephone alone. In 30% of cases, the referring clinicians felt that the patient would have been transferred to higher facility in the absence of the telehealth facility. Clinicians thought that almost all consultations had educational value and reduced their anxiety in dealing with acute paediatric problems. There were no adverse outcomes or delayed transfers of patients staying at their rural sites. We recommend that telehealth consultation occur for all enquiries about acute paediatric patients at rural sites, especially if transfer of the patient is being considered.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 89 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 1%
India 1 1%
Korea, Republic of 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Unknown 85 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 14 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 9%
Student > Bachelor 8 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 7 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 7%
Other 19 21%
Unknown 27 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 35 39%
Business, Management and Accounting 5 6%
Psychology 5 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 2%
Other 9 10%
Unknown 29 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 November 2013.
All research outputs
#17,703,558
of 22,731,677 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare
#925
of 1,152 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#152,402
of 213,690 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare
#11
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,731,677 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,152 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.6. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 213,690 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.