| Title |
Questioning the use of PEGylation for drug delivery
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Drug Delivery and Translational Research, September 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s13346-013-0176-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Johan J. F. Verhoef, Thomas J. Anchordoquy |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 34 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 15% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 6% |
| Poland | 1 | 3% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 3% |
| Czechia | 1 | 3% |
| Ecuador | 1 | 3% |
| Georgia | 1 | 3% |
| India | 1 | 3% |
| Japan | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 2 | 6% |
| Unknown | 18 | 53% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 27 | 79% |
| Scientists | 4 | 12% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 6% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 370 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Russia | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 368 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 82 | 22% |
| Student > Bachelor | 43 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 40 | 11% |
| Researcher | 27 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 20 | 5% |
| Other | 51 | 14% |
| Unknown | 107 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 58 | 16% |
| Chemistry | 45 | 12% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 42 | 11% |
| Engineering | 25 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 20 | 5% |
| Other | 65 | 18% |
| Unknown | 115 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 44. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 March 2024.
All research outputs
#951,537
of 25,880,422 outputs
Outputs from Drug Delivery and Translational Research
#16
of 641 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,214
of 218,041 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Drug Delivery and Translational Research
#1
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,880,422 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 641 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 218,041 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.