You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Evaluation of CT Perfusion in the Setting of Cerebral Ischemia: Patterns and Pitfalls
|
---|---|
Published in |
American Journal of Neuroradiology, February 2010
|
DOI | 10.3174/ajnr.a2026 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Y W Lui, E R Tang, A M Allmendinger, V Spektor |
Abstract |
CTP has a growing role in evaluating stroke. It can be performed immediately following NCCT and has advantages of accessibility and speed. Differentiation of salvageable ischemic penumbra from unsalvageable core infarct may help identify patients most likely to benefit from thrombectomy or thrombolysis. Still, CTP interpretation can be complex. We review normal and ischemic perfusion patterns followed by an illustrative series of technical/diagnostic challenges of CTP interpretation in the setting of acute stroke syndromes. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Mexico | 2 | 40% |
Spain | 2 | 40% |
United States | 1 | 20% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 4 | 80% |
Scientists | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 330 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 3 | <1% |
Canada | 2 | <1% |
United States | 2 | <1% |
Brazil | 1 | <1% |
Singapore | 1 | <1% |
Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 320 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Other | 57 | 17% |
Researcher | 55 | 17% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 35 | 11% |
Student > Postgraduate | 23 | 7% |
Student > Bachelor | 20 | 6% |
Other | 79 | 24% |
Unknown | 61 | 18% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 171 | 52% |
Neuroscience | 27 | 8% |
Engineering | 12 | 4% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 11 | 3% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 8 | 2% |
Other | 25 | 8% |
Unknown | 76 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 April 2023.
All research outputs
#2,453,328
of 24,608,500 outputs
Outputs from American Journal of Neuroradiology
#461
of 5,133 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,188
of 97,871 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Journal of Neuroradiology
#5
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,608,500 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,133 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 97,871 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.