↓ Skip to main content

Evaluation of CT Perfusion in the Setting of Cerebral Ischemia: Patterns and Pitfalls

Overview of attention for article published in American Journal of Neuroradiology, February 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
5 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
114 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
330 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Evaluation of CT Perfusion in the Setting of Cerebral Ischemia: Patterns and Pitfalls
Published in
American Journal of Neuroradiology, February 2010
DOI 10.3174/ajnr.a2026
Pubmed ID
Authors

Y W Lui, E R Tang, A M Allmendinger, V Spektor

Abstract

CTP has a growing role in evaluating stroke. It can be performed immediately following NCCT and has advantages of accessibility and speed. Differentiation of salvageable ischemic penumbra from unsalvageable core infarct may help identify patients most likely to benefit from thrombectomy or thrombolysis. Still, CTP interpretation can be complex. We review normal and ischemic perfusion patterns followed by an illustrative series of technical/diagnostic challenges of CTP interpretation in the setting of acute stroke syndromes.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 330 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
United States 2 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Singapore 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Unknown 320 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 57 17%
Researcher 55 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 35 11%
Student > Postgraduate 23 7%
Student > Bachelor 20 6%
Other 79 24%
Unknown 61 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 171 52%
Neuroscience 27 8%
Engineering 12 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 2%
Other 25 8%
Unknown 76 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 April 2023.
All research outputs
#2,453,328
of 24,608,500 outputs
Outputs from American Journal of Neuroradiology
#461
of 5,133 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,188
of 97,871 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Journal of Neuroradiology
#5
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,608,500 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,133 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 97,871 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.