↓ Skip to main content

A silicon carbide room-temperature single-photon source

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Materials, November 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
patent
1 patent
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
457 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
451 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A silicon carbide room-temperature single-photon source
Published in
Nature Materials, November 2013
DOI 10.1038/nmat3806
Pubmed ID
Authors

S. Castelletto, B. C. Johnson, V. Ivády, N. Stavrias, T. Umeda, A. Gali, T. Ohshima

Abstract

Over the past few years, single-photon generation has been realized in numerous systems: single molecules, quantum dots, diamond colour centres and others. The generation and detection of single photons play a central role in the experimental foundation of quantum mechanics and measurement theory. An efficient and high-quality single-photon source is needed to implement quantum key distribution, quantum repeaters and photonic quantum information processing. Here we report the identification and formation of ultrabright, room-temperature, photostable single-photon sources in a device-friendly material, silicon carbide (SiC). The source is composed of an intrinsic defect, known as the carbon antisite-vacancy pair, created by carefully optimized electron irradiation and annealing of ultrapure SiC. An extreme brightness (2×10(6) counts s(-1)) resulting from polarization rules and a high quantum efficiency is obtained in the bulk without resorting to the use of a cavity or plasmonic structure. This may benefit future integrated quantum photonic devices.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 451 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 8 2%
Hungary 2 <1%
France 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
Japan 2 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
China 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Other 2 <1%
Unknown 428 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 141 31%
Researcher 78 17%
Student > Master 59 13%
Student > Bachelor 22 5%
Professor > Associate Professor 19 4%
Other 50 11%
Unknown 82 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 216 48%
Engineering 60 13%
Materials Science 47 10%
Chemistry 22 5%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 <1%
Other 10 2%
Unknown 92 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 January 2023.
All research outputs
#3,685,589
of 23,515,785 outputs
Outputs from Nature Materials
#2,108
of 4,061 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,340
of 305,870 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Materials
#31
of 52 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,515,785 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,061 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 32.5. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 305,870 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 52 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.