↓ Skip to main content

Clinical anatomy of ligamentum nuchae

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Anatomy, October 2003
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
47 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
71 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Clinical anatomy of ligamentum nuchae
Published in
Clinical Anatomy, October 2003
DOI 10.1002/ca.10121
Pubmed ID
Authors

Susan R. Mercer, Nikolai Bogduk

Abstract

In view of the disparities in the anatomical, clinical, and biomechanical literature this study was undertaken to reappraise the gross anatomy of ligamentum nuchae with the objective of providing an accurate anatomical basis for biomechanical studies and for clinical theories and practices. Ligamentum nuchae was studied by gross dissection in ten embalmed human adult cadavers and was found to be comprised of two structures: a dorsal raphe and a midline fascial septum. The dorsal raphe was formed by the interweaving of the right and left upper trapezius, splenius capitis, and rhomboid minor. It spanned the cervical spine and was firmly attached to the external occipital protuberance and to the spinous process of C7. The fascial septum consisted of dense connective tissue and ran ventrally from the midline raphe to be confluent with the interspinous ligaments and atlanto-axial and atlanto-occipital membranes. These findings agree with those anatomical descriptions that portray ligamentum nuchae as a two-part structure but not with those studies in which it is characterized as a strong ligament attaching to all cervical spinous processes. Importantly, the findings of this study emphasize the need for clinical and biomechanical literature to portray the gross anatomy of ligamentum nuchae accurately.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 71 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 1%
Austria 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Egypt 1 1%
Japan 1 1%
Unknown 66 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 13%
Other 8 11%
Student > Master 7 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 10%
Professor 7 10%
Other 27 38%
Unknown 6 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 31 44%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 7%
Engineering 4 6%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 4 6%
Other 10 14%
Unknown 11 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 November 2013.
All research outputs
#15,285,728
of 22,731,677 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Anatomy
#817
of 1,264 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#46,976
of 52,125 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Anatomy
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,731,677 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,264 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.7. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 52,125 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them