You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A genome-wide association study identifies CDHR3 as a susceptibility locus for early childhood asthma with severe exacerbations
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Genetics, November 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1038/ng.2830 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Klaus Bønnelykke, Patrick Sleiman, Kasper Nielsen, Eskil Kreiner-Møller, Josep M Mercader, Danielle Belgrave, Herman T den Dekker, Anders Husby, Astrid Sevelsted, Grissel Faura-Tellez, Li Juel Mortensen, Lavinia Paternoster, Richard Flaaten, Anne Mølgaard, David E Smart, Philip F Thomsen, Morten A Rasmussen, Silvia Bonàs-Guarch, Claus Holst, Ellen A Nohr, Rachita Yadav, Michael E March, Thomas Blicher, Peter M Lackie, Vincent W V Jaddoe, Angela Simpson, John W Holloway, Liesbeth Duijts, Adnan Custovic, Donna E Davies, David Torrents, Ramneek Gupta, Mads V Hollegaard, David M Hougaard, Hakon Hakonarson, Hans Bisgaard |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 6 | 43% |
| Denmark | 1 | 7% |
| Kuwait | 1 | 7% |
| Ecuador | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 5 | 36% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 10 | 71% |
| Scientists | 2 | 14% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 7% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 342 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Norway | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Finland | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 3 | <1% |
| Unknown | 325 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 81 | 24% |
| Researcher | 71 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 26 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 22 | 6% |
| Student > Bachelor | 21 | 6% |
| Other | 67 | 20% |
| Unknown | 54 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 88 | 26% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 73 | 21% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 50 | 15% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 32 | 9% |
| Computer Science | 5 | 1% |
| Other | 24 | 7% |
| Unknown | 70 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 191. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 February 2024.
All research outputs
#211,460
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Nature Genetics
#347
of 7,639 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,787
of 320,921 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Genetics
#2
of 69 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,639 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 43.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 320,921 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 69 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.