↓ Skip to main content

End-of-life care pathways for improving outcomes in caring for the dying

Overview of attention for article published in this source, November 2013
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
50 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
188 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
End-of-life care pathways for improving outcomes in caring for the dying
Published by
John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, November 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd008006.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Chan, Raymond J, Webster, Joan

Abstract

This is an updated version of a Cochrane review first published in Issue 1, 2010 of The Cochrane Library. In many clinical areas, integrated care pathways are utilised as structured multidisciplinary care plans that detail essential steps in caring for patients with specific clinical problems. In particular, care pathways for the dying have been developed as a model to improve care of patients who are in the last days of life. The care pathways were designed with an aim of ensuring that the most appropriate management occurs at the most appropriate time and that it is provided by the most appropriate health professional. There have been sustained concerns about the safety of implementing end-of-life care pathways, particularly in the UK. Therefore, there is a significant need for clinicians and policy makers to be informed about the effects of end-of-life care pathways with a systematic review.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 28 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 188 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 5 3%
Spain 2 1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Indonesia 1 <1%
Cyprus 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 176 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 32 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 28 15%
Researcher 27 14%
Student > Bachelor 14 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 6%
Other 42 22%
Unknown 34 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 76 40%
Nursing and Health Professions 35 19%
Social Sciences 13 7%
Psychology 5 3%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 4 2%
Other 21 11%
Unknown 34 18%